Testing self driving in Nissan Ariya in Tokyo traffic.
Riding in a Self-Driving Nissan Ariya
To get a sense of the latest ProPilot in action, we took a 40-minute ride through the center of Tokyo, from the Prince Hotel, under the Shimbashi overpass, past the Imperial hotel, and through the famous, and famously busy Ginza 4-Chome Crossing before returning to the hotel. Nissan said its approach was to design a system that could handle the most complicated areas like the Ginza Crossing, making it easier to then expand anywhere.
Serving as host and safety monitor was Tetsuya Iijima, executive chief engineer of Nissan’s AD/ADAS advanced technology engineering department. Iijima entered the destination on the navigation screen and off we went, with the system updating location and surroundings data every 100 milliseconds.
ADVERTISEMENT – CONTINUE READING BELOW
Hands off, Iijima-san
The route was chock full of pedestrians, traffic, and confusing intersections. The automated Ariya maneuvered around trucks, buses, and motorcycles. The car was patient in intersections, where throngs of pedestrians made it hard to advance. It navigated around cones in construction areas reduced to a single lane with trucks and equipment blocking a lane. It followed and finally got past a garbage truck making multiple stops. It did it all with the same mix of patience and aggression a normal driver would employ. It was never hesitant; there were no incidents or sudden braking.
Iijima never had to touch a wheel or pedal to intervene. The roads we traveled on were in good shape—no potholes—but the car is trained to avoid any road’s pitfalls when it sees them. Our weather was also perfect, but the system is designed to drive in fog, rain, snow, or other adverse conditions. If the cameras become covered, the system will deactivate. For robotaxis, self-cleaning cameras will be necessary. At the end of the ride, the Ariya parked itself at the end of the drive, albeit it chose a spot further from the entrance than necessary.
Like Tesla’s FSD, the Nissan system will offer varying levels of driving aggression, from conservative to those who want the car to exceed the speed limit.
ADVERTISEMENT – CONTINUE READING BELOW
As an added safety feature, if the driver fails to keep their eyes on the road for two seconds, the system will issue a warning and if it isn’t heeded, it will slow the vehicle and bring it to a safe stop.
Iijima told us that he has a deep trust in the system. He thinks within a month most people would be completely confident in it. He has seldom had to touch the wheel in all his hours and miles of testing.
Subaru has had a loyal cult-like following ever since it entered the US back in 1968. However, when it won the World Rally Championship for three years consecutively from 1995 to 1997, people started to appreciate the brand’s cars even more. The Subaru Legacy is one such car that was built around the same period, but seems to have been forgotten as time passed by. We are here to tell you why the 1998 Subaru Legacy may be an underrated gem. As with any car from this period, there is a lot to know and research before going to buy an almost 30-year-old car. This guide should be your comprehensive insight into Subaru’s forgotten sedan/wagon, to help you determine if it is the right fit for you, what you should look out for, and what they actually cost in today’s day and age.
Base Trim Engine
2.5L H4 ICE
Base Trim Transmission
8-SPEED CVT
Base Trim Drivetrain
All-Wheel Drive
Base Trim Horsepower
182 HP @5800 RPM
Base Trim Torque
176 LB.-FT. @ 4400 RPM
Base Trim Fuel Economy (city/highway/combined)
27/35/30 MPG
Infotainment & Features
9 /10
We’ve used reputable sources to determine the value of the Subaru Legacy and its reliability record. As with any used car purchase, your results may vary and CarBuzz advises used-car buyers to do due diligence before buying.
A Brief History Of The Subaru Legacy
The Underdog On Debut
In 1990, the US market was pretty saturated in terms of picking a sedan. Honda and Toyota were completely dominating the competition with their Accord and Camry, respectively. If you wanted reliability, you could buy a Camry with your eyes shut. If you wanted an all-rounder, the Accord would satisfy all your needs. If you wanted a car to tackle dirt roads and go off-road, you never looked at sedans as an option and went for an SUV or wagon instead.
In 1990, Subaru decided to do something different. It launched the Subaru Legacy in both sedan and wagon body styles with an option to make them all-wheel drive. At the time, most sedans were FWD, which gave the Legacy an immediate advantage for someone who was looking for a sedan/wagon body style that could tackle challenging conditions. However, the car that changed the automotive landscape in the US was the Legacy Outback trim.
Why Should You Own A Subaru Legacy?
Outback Made The Legacy A Great Buy
1998 Subaru Legacy Specs
Engine
2.2L Boxer Four-cylinder (EJ22)
2.5L Boxer Four-cylinder (EJ25)
Transmission
5-speed Manual or 4-speed Automatic
Drivetrain
FWD/ AWD
AWD
Power
135 hp
165 hp
Torque
137 lb-ft
162 lb-ft
The 1998 Subaru Legacy was available in so many trims that there was always a Legacy for everybody. The Brighton trim was the entry point, with basic features such manual windows and steel wheels, and it came with the smaller 2.2L engine, which actually turned out to be the more reliable of the two engine options. The L trim was the most common of the Legacy range and added features such as air conditioning and cruise control. AWD was optional on both these entry models, as well, as Subaru wanted this car to appeal to people looking for that feature in a sedan and wagon body style. Both these trims were also available as either sedan or wagon. There were also some sedan-only performance trims called the GT and GT Limited. This trim got the bigger 2.5L boxer engine with sport-tuned suspension and alloy wheels.
However, the most influential trim out of all the Legacies was the wagon exclusive Outback trim. The Legacy Outback was way ahead of its time and basically gave birth to the crossover market in the United States. It featured a raised ride height and rugged styling with a two-tone paint finish with standard AWD. The Outback Limited was the ultimate Legacy, with leather upholstery and heated seats. The Outback trim differentiated the Legacy from its rivals like the Accord and Camry as the perfect option for people wanting a car that could tackle rugged terrain while still looking like a wagon.
How Much Is A 1998 Subaru Legacy?
Rare To Find, But Not Impossible
Whoever bought a Subaru Legacy in the 90s bought one to use it thoroughly, so it is difficult to find low mileage examples. However, there are some examples listed ranging from $2,900 to $7,000. In 1998, the Subaru Legacy Outback Wagon was the most popular trim of this era. There is an example on sale that starts from just under $4,000 for a car with around 100,000 miles. GT sedans are rarer and usually demand more money. There is one currently on sale for just under $7,000 with 192,000 miles on the odometer. On BringATrailer.com, the cheapest 1998 Subaru Legacy Outback sold for $6,900 while the more expensive trims such as the GT trims sell for north of $10,000.
Common Problems With The Subaru Legacy
One Major Issue To Look Out For
The Subaru Legacy ’98 was never marketed as the most reliable car, and some of its problems become even more apparent once the car reaches almost 30 years of being on the road. Here are some of the most common issues to look out for before buying a 1998 Subaru Legacy:
Head gasket: The biggest issue plaguing the Legacy is the head gasket failing, specifically on the 2.5 liter Boxer engine. Failures are typically reported around the 85,000 to 120,000-mile mark. Keep an eye out for replaced head gaskets if you are looking at Outbacks or GT trims, and note how many miles the car has done after they were replaced. If replaced recently, the 2.5-liter engine is generally reliable with no other major issues. The 2.2-liter engine is down on power between the two, but it is usually more reliable with no major concerns.
ABS system: Some reports have noted an issue with the ABS system, where the pump runs constantly, draining and wearing down the battery.
Oil pump seal may leak: The oil pump seal may be prone to excessive wear on cars that were not properly maintained. Cars with proper maintenance records and timely repairs should not be affected by this issue.
Rust: In cities where road salt is common, make sure to check for rust in the wheel arches and close to the subframe.
Subaru Legacy Running Costs
The Price Of Choosing Niche
1998 Subaru Legacy OutbackBring a Trailer
With two engine options, it meant if you wanted better mileage, you chose the smaller back, while the larger 2.5-liter delivered superior performance. That stands true even today, with the 2.2-liter engine being the better option for fuel economy with an EPA estimated city/highway/combined rating of 21/29/24 mpg. If the head gaskets are intact on the 2.5-liter version, it is good for an average of 19/25/21 mpg. The Legacy is a good car for fuel economy, even today, with the 2WD variants being even better for overall range.
A head gasket repair could cost you up to $2,500, so it is vital you know if and when they were replaced. A new ABS system may set you back around $100. The fuel pump seal is a relatively cheap fix, around $20 if it has not led to any other damage. The AWD versions also need to have all of their tires changed at the same time to make sure they are evenly matched, costing you up to $700 per set to install. As this is a relatively old car, insurance should be cheap, and the car has now fully depreciated.
Summary: Is The Subaru Legacy A Good Buy?
A Good Example Could Be Very Appealing
1998 Subaru Legacy OutbackBring a Trailer
The Subaru Legacy was ahead of its time in so many ways. Being offered as a sedan and a wagon was very rare at the time, and the Outback laid the path for future crossovers, which have now become one of the biggest markets in America. If you find a well-maintained car with its head gaskets replaced, especially for the 2.5L Outback and GT variants, the Legacy is a refreshing change of pace and is a solid option for people looking for a work horse, but also a pioneer of its time. Otherwise, the 2.2-liter Brighton and L are solid options as an entry into one of the most iconic cars from the Japanese manufacturer.
Porsche has reclaimed the record for the fastest lap time for a four-door production car at the iconic Nürburgring race track in Germany, less than a year after losing the mantle to China’s Xiaomi, one of the world’s leading smartphone companies.
The Xiaomi’s SU7 Ultra model, a tri-motor high-performance electric sedan, took the title last June, but Porsche has returned to the track with another special edition of the electric Taycan, shaving 10 seconds off Xiaomi’s time, and completing the lap in under 6 minutes 56 seconds on the almost 21 km track.
Kevin Giek, the head of the Taycan model line said the new Manthey Kit offers a “unique upgrade” for the Taycan Turbo GT. “The small but impactful project team from Manthey and Porsche has succeeded in transferring the Manthey DNA into a kit for electric vehicles. This effort has culminated in an impressive new Nordschleife record,” he said.
This lap record post got mixed comments with some congratulating the sports car brand and said: “Congrats Porsche! 🏆” Others compared it to the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra and said: “That’s actually pathetic considering this [Xiaomi SU7 Ultra] is only 9 seconds behind while costing ⅓ the price”.
The latest lap run with the Manthey Kit adds further performance to the 4-door sedan and has performed even better than the Weissach package it had used previously, which helped the car do the same lap in 7 minutes and 7 seconds.
The kit includes quite a few components, covering aerodynamic parts like the massive rear carbon-fibre wing, front diffuser, rear carbon aero discs to help reduce drag. These parts alone will help triple the downforce over the standard model.
Other components included cassis and suspension tuning as well as lighter 21-inch forged wheels, paired with street-legal wider tyres.
According to Porsche, the car that got that lap time was fitted with special track tyres, Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS, which likely provided better grip around corners.
On the braking front, the kit includes a larger braking system, performance brake pads for a significant bump in deceleration rate.
Powering was also increased with maximum discharge current from the battery being increased, helping with a 10-second Attack Mode, where 730 kW of power is available.
The latest lap time from Porsche in the Taycan Turbo GT with Manthey Kit appears to be in a highly modified car, which does not meet the “production” car description in our eyes.
We look forward to seeing what Xiaomi counters this with; after all, it’s the SU7 Ultra Prototype that lapped the same circuit in under 6 minutes and 23 seconds, over 30 seconds faster than the latest Porsche.
Porsche Taycan Turbo GT lap
Sign up for The Driven’s free daily newsletter and get the latest EV news and analysis delivered straight to your inbox.
Our free daily newsletter sends the stories that really matter directly to you, every weekday.
Making power is often easier than making use of it. That’s especially true when you’re working with a Ford F-150 Raptor R, which isn’t designed for maximum on-road traction or handling. That requires some creative solutions, like getting a tire manufacturer to build you 39-inch slicks.
YouTuber Brad DeBerti took his Raptor R to over 1,600 horsepower with twin turbos, at which point the truck became decidedly less drivable. BF Goodrich makes the stock tires for the Raptor—All-Terrain T/A KO2s as big as 37 inches. They’re perfect for off-roading but not for getting power down on pavement. And since DeBerti is looking to spend more time at the drag strip with his Raptor R, he decided to go in the complete opposite direction and asked BF Goodrich if it could make a set of 39-inch slicks. From the looks of it, BF Goodrich delivered.
The enormous slicks look sick, and should help improve the drivability of this highly modified Raptor R. Where the stock all-terrain tires have deep treads to claw at uneven surfaces, the slicks have none. That provides the largest possible contact patch, which is key for maximizing grip. That’s why slicks are the default for most forms of racing done on pavement—especially drag racing. DeBerti also lowered the truck to make it easier to drive on pavement, a move that he’s quick to note may be controversial among Raptor fans. But he’s probably not losing sleep over the extra engagement that controversy generates.
I LOWERED My Ford Raptor R.. BIG MISTAKE?
This isn’t the first time we’ve seen someone put slicks on an off-road pickup. In 2022 some genius did the same thing with a Ram 1500 TRX, enabling the 702-hp truck to run a 10.922-second quarter mile at 124 mph, exceeding the factory-quoted top speed by six mph. It shows that there’s plenty of appetite for high-horsepower trucks, even if they don’t ever see dirt. So maybe automakers should consider more traditional street trucks like the original Ford F-150 Lightning.
JAC Motors Austraia said an expected 50:50 sales volume split between the JAC T9 diesel ute and the inbound Hunter Plug-In Hybrid will greatly help its New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) position.
Like every car manufacturer in Australia, JAC must meet the requirements of NVES emissions regulations introduced in January 2025.
The JAC T9 is classed as a Light Commercial Vehicle or a Type 2 Vehicle under the NVES regulations, meaning under 2026 standards it must emit on average 180 grams of CO2 per kilometre or less to avoid incurring NVES penalties.
However, the T9 is rated at a non-compliant 202g/km, but JAC is confident it can balance the NVES scales with its low emissions Hunter PHEV according to its local director of technical and Product Hongjian Jiang.
“The CO2 emissions on the NEDC testing cycle for the PHEV is 38 grams per kilometre. It’s very low. So, we will be in a very good position to balance the T9 diesel,” he told GoAuto at a recent preview drive for the Hunter PHEV in NSW.
Save for the BYD Shark 6 Performance – for which the brand quotes its WLTP test figure of 23 grams per kilometre – the JAC Hunter PHEV’s carbon emissions are the lowest in Australia’s plug-in hybrid ute segment.
For reference, the cab-chassis and non-performance dual cab variants of the BYD Shark 6 are rated at 46g/km on the NEDC cycle.
Meanwhile, the Ford Ranger PHEV emits 66g/km while the GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV emits 39g/km.
JAC Motors Australia managing director Ahmed Mahmoud said he is expecting a 50:50 volume split between the diesel-powered T9 and the plug-in hybrid Hunter, although production remains flexible enough to accommodate a vast majority of either powertrain.
“If it’s 100 per cent diesel or 100 per cent hybrid, the factory is agile enough to be able to accommodate what we need here in Australia,” he said.
“But I would say it will settle to a point where we’d be around 50:50.
“At launch, because there’s going to be your natural early adopters that jump on board, I think you’ll find the ratio will be more in favour of the Hunter before it settles out, because there are still plenty of customers out there that need a diesel ute and (for whom) electrification or plug-in (hybrid technology) just doesn’t work for.”
The proposed 50:50 volume split seems to contradict trends in the wider Australian automotive industry.
While the PHEV space has grown dramatically in recent years, the technology still holds a relatively small market share compared with vehicles powered solely by internal combustion.
According to the latest available data on the Australian Automobile Association’s Electric Vehicle Index, 64.23 per cent of new vehicle sales so far in 2026 are ICE-powered only, while plug-in hybrids make up 6.82 per cent of all new vehicles sold.
Looking at 4WD utes, ICE-powered models make up just shy of 90 per cent of new vehicle sales while plug-in hybrids take up 9.55 per cent.
The leading success story when it comes to plug-in hybrid ute sales is unquestionably the BYD Shark 6.
With 18,073 examples sold in 2025, the Shark 6 was the best-selling plug-in hybrid ute in Australia, but also the best-selling PHEV regardless of segment and the 18th best-selling vehicle overall.
Since its Australian arrival back in 2024, just shy of 2000 examples of the JAC T9 diesel ute have been sold on local shores.
When the Hunter PHEV goes on sale in the middle of this year, the range will comprise the entry-level Pro and the range-topping X variants, with pricing starting “under $50,000” before on-road costs.
A cab-chassis variant of the Hunter PHEV is also expected in the near future.
This pricing is likely to make the Hunter PHEV the cheapest plug-in hybrid ute on sale in the Australian market.
With an exact figure yet to be revealed, it remains unclear precisely where it will sit relative to its T9 stablemate, which is currently available from $38,990 + ORCs.
California offers many state, regional, utility, and local incentives for electric, hydrogen, and plug-in hybrid vehicles. This list changes regularly, and many programs are limited by funding, income eligibility, location, or vehicle type. Because the federal clean vehicle tax credits are not available for vehicles acquired after September 30, 2025, buyers should verify current state and local program availability before purchasing or leasing.
Clean Vehicle Rebate Project
The Clean Vehicle Rebate Project (CVRP) is closed to new applications. CVRP closed effective November 8, 2023. The program previously provided rebates for eligible new and leased plug-in hybrid, battery-electric, and fuel-cell vehicles.
Clean Cars 4 All
Clean Cars 4 All (CC4A) provides incentives to help lower-income consumers in priority populations replace older, higher-polluting vehicles with cleaner transportation. Eligible participants may be able to purchase or lease a new or used plug-in hybrid, battery-electric, fuel-cell vehicle, or zero-emission motorcycle, or choose other clean mobility options, depending on the regional program. Incentive amounts and application status vary by air district and funding availability.
California Air Resources Board
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) supports several clean-transportation incentive programs, but buyers should verify the specific program before purchase because application status, funding, income limits, and eligible vehicles vary. CARB-backed programs include Clean Cars 4 All and other income-qualified clean-vehicle assistance programs, rather than a single general CARB EV rebate available to all buyers.
The following local programs are also available:
Alameda Municipal Power
Alameda Municipal Power (AMP) offers a rebate for purchasing a used EV priced below $40,000. The base incentive is $1,500, and qualified lower-income buyers may receive up to $6,000 in rebates. AMP also provides a $500 rebate to residential customers who purchase a Level 2 charging station and offers a time-of-use rate to customers who own or lease an EV.
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
The Bay Area Air Quality Management District runs a Clean Cars for All program for low-income residents. You may be able to redeem up to $10,000 when you retire a registered vehicle model year 2007 and older and replace it with a hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or battery-electric car. Applicants can also receive an additional bonus, up to $2,000, for installing a Level 2 home charging station or opt for a complimentary Level 2 portable charger (valued at up to $600).
Community Housing Development Corp
The Community Housing Development Corp. (CHDC) partnered with the California Air Resources Board to offer advanced technology vehicle financing incentives. It provides low-interest loans and up to $7,500 toward purchasing a new or used electric vehicle.
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) customers can obtain a Charge Up LA! An incentive providing up to $1,500 when purchasing a qualifying pre-owned electric or hybrid vehicle. Low-income customers may qualify for a $4,000 rebate. Customers can also receive a rebate of up to $1,000 to purchase and install qualifying Level 2 EV charging stations. Low-income customers are eligible for an additional $500 rebate.
Marin Clean Energy
Marin Clean Energy provides qualifying low-income customers with a $3,500 instant rebate for purchasing or leasing a new EV or plug-in hybrid or $2,000 to lower the price of used EVs.
Pacific Gas and Electric
Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) gives residents a $500 rebate for installing a Level 2 charging station through their Empower EV program. Customers may also qualify for an additional $2,000 to help cover the costs of upgrading their electrical panel.
After purchasing a pre-owned electric vehicle, PG&E also gives residential customers with qualifying incomes up to $4,000 in rebates through its Drive Forward Electric program.
Pasadena Water and Power
The Pasadena Water and Power (PWP) electric vehicle incentive provides a rebate of up to $250 when purchasing a used EV or PHEV. An additional $250 is available when the purchase is from a Pasadena auto dealer. Lower-income residents may be eligible for an additional $1,000.
Riverside Public Utilities
The Riverside Public Utilities (RPU) gives a rebate of up to $1,000 when you purchase or lease a qualifying used battery electric or plug-in hybrid from a dealer after Jan. 1, 2023. Customers enrolled in RPU’s SHARE program can get an increased rebate of up to $2,500. Additionally, customers who install a Level 2 charger at home can qualify for a $500 plus a rate meter rebate of up to $805.
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) provides a time-of-use rate when you charge your EV between midnight and 6 a.m. SMUD offers customers a rebate of up to $750 for EV charging equipment and installation costs.
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District’s (APCD) Drive Clean in the San Joaquin Rebate Program is closed because program funding has been exhausted. The district’s vehicle replacement program has also stopped accepting applications until additional funding becomes available. Residents should check the district’s Drive Clean program pages before purchasing or leasing, because funding and application windows may change.
Silicon Valley Power
Silicon Valley Power (SVP) gives a rebate of up to $3,500 for purchasing a PHEV or EV to residents who qualify based on their income. EVs are eligible for $1,500, and PHEVs are eligible for $1,000. Income-eligible customers receive a $1,000 bonus rebate. Vehicles with an MPGe of 117 or greater may receive a bonus rebate of $1,000. SVP also gives residential customers a $550 rebate for installing a Level 2 EV charging station with Wi-Fi capabilities. You may also be eligible to receive a $1,000 rebate to help cover the cost of upgrading your electrical panel to accommodate the Level 2 charger.
Southern California Edison
Southern California Edison’s pre-owned EV rebate of up to $4,000 applies to customers who purchase or lease a used EV from the list of eligible vehicles.
Turlock Irrigation District
Turlock Irrigation District offers an electric vehicle rebate of $500 for customers who purchase a qualifying new or used zero-emission, battery-electric vehicle. If enrolled in the CARES program, you can receive an additional $700 per vehicle, with a maximum of two electric vehicles per residential account.
California allows EV drivers to use the HOV carpool lane regardless of the number of occupants in the vehicle. You must apply for a “Clean Air Vehicle” sticker from the Department of Motor Vehicles.
Our free daily newsletter sends the stories that really matter directly to you, every weekday.
There are so many vehicles trying to cash in on the American dream of owning a truck with a classic vibe but a modern feel. I’ve driven them all, and finally I’ve driven the best one: the two-door Ford Bronco. Specifically, the manual base model with the Sasquatch package. It’s the perfect balance of rough and refined, practical and powerful. It’s one of my favorite new vehicles I’ve driven in a long time.
The sixth-gen Bronco has now been out for almost six years; general impressions are well documented. I’m going to skip the standard car-review contextualization and focus on this unique sub-model and my experience with it on a light overland excursion around Southern California.
What makes this particular Bronco interesting is that it’s ostensibly the ultimate enthusiast spec: Minimum-possible MSRP with just one factory option: Ford’s max-capability off-road kit.
Andrew P. Collins
The “Basequatch”
Every Bronco has decent off-road capability by virtue of its architecture, but some models are more optimized for rough terrain than others. The $80,000 Bronco Raptor is a high-speed desert-running beast. The $50,000 Badlands model has a well-rounded essentials loadout: big tires, rear locker, performance suspension. But the $43,000 base model with the $8,500 Sasquatch kit is effectively the best-value extreme-capability combo.
Here’s how the base Bronco’s appearance changes when you add the Sasquatch kit. Ford
This setup is unofficially known as the “Basequatch,” and if you’re really planning to wheel, it’s an incredibly good deal. The ‘squatch package adds front and rear lockers, 35-inch tires on cool 17-inch wheels, big fender flares, tall Bilstein dampers with high clearance and good multi-surface damping, and a 4.7 final drive ratio to provide snappier low-speed power and help the four-cylinder engine cope with those tall tires.
Eight and a half grand is a lot of money for an options package. But I promise that if you rocked up to an off-road shop and asked for all that installed on whatever you’re currently driving, the bill would be higher. Whether you’re a lifetime Ford fan or have a sticker of Calvin peeing on a blue oval on your back window, you have to admit—being able to bundle that all up as a factory-approved and warrantied setup right off the showroom floor is pretty darn cool.
That said, you don’t need the Sasquatch pack to enjoy driving a Bronco off-road. Just like you don’t need a Porsche to have fun in the canyons, or even on a track. But the Basequatch really is an all-around awesome set-and-forget setup you could buy and wheel for years without needing any further mods. If you’re hitting the limits of what you can conquer with 35s and two lockers, you probably need a full-on rock crawling rig.
Swipe through these images below to take a look around the Bronco’s underside. Ford did a pretty good job tucking things up high and protecting sensitive areas. The two-door Basequatch’s clearance, approach, and departure specs are absolutely incredible—you’ll find the numbers at the bottom of this story.
If you want the manual transmission (you do), the only Bronco engine option is a 2.3-liter turbocharged four-cylinder. The specs are really solid (300 hp and even more torque, with tunes readily available for more). In practice, it’s… fine. It’s not fast, but thanks to this model’s gearing, it’s got grunt where you need it. It cruises at 75 mph without wheezing too much. Most importantly, it’s been around long enough that it should be easy to keep running if you break something out in the bush.
The Right Amount of Rough
I love my 1975 International Scout, but I can’t kid myself, it objectively sucks to drive. It’s slow, and stinky, and keeping it in a lane is like trying to walk a hungry dog through a deli. I love my ’98 Montero, too, but every time I have to make a panic stop, I remember there are only two ancient airbags protecting me from the outside world. Those SUVs feel like trucks, which is great, but driving them every day in fast-moving modern traffic would be arduous. A new Bronco with a manual transmission and huge tires feels like a truck, too. There’s a lot of wind noise, body roll, and aggressive acceleration isn’t particularly rewarding. But the Bronco is less punishing overall, while still capturing enough of the classic vibe that makes my old rigs so endearing. And critically, the aesthetic is excellent. The two-door sixth-gen Bronco just looks right.
The cockpit is pretty great, thanks to a pretty generous allotment of hard keys. Seats are not world-class, but darn decent for a truck. Andrew P. Collins
It’s got more airbags, auto emergency braking, good headlights, and visibility. The only real bummer in terms of refinement with the Basequatch is that it doesn’t have heated seats—that’s locked to higher trim levels.
The Bronco’s dashboard screens are pretty big, but integrated well enough to be largely inoffensive. I would still much rather have three-dimensional analog gauges, but the central infotainment screen is low enough that I don’t feel I’m peering over it as I do in some other new trucks. I also like how the Apple CarPlay interface is contained to a corner, while I still have vehicle-control access on the screen (you can see what I mean in the image above).
I also loved how easily I could pop off the front section of the hardtop. Just a couple of lever throws, and I turned my borrowed Bronco into a little targa. Would have loved to have pulled the whole roof, but there was nowhere to leave it at the highway-side Motel 6 I was based out of while playing around in Johnson Valley, Joshua Tree, and the hilly highlands between the Mojave and Venice Beach.
Bronco vs. Wrangler and 4Runner
Ultimately, I think the Bronco really speaks to me because it splits the difference between the Jeep Wrangler and the Toyota 4Runner. It’s got some goofy golden retriever energy thanks to its removable roof, stocky design, and short wheelbase. But it’s also got more Australian shepherdish intelligence, with surprisingly decent on-road driving dynamics and a decent execution of interior fit-and-finish.
Andrew P. Collins, Benjamin Preston
People like to say that a Wrangler’s solid front axle lets it take more abuse, and it does, but the payoff in better handling and daily driving dynamics that the Bronco gets with independent front suspension is worth it. Even on these 35s, this Bronco rode around town more comfortably than any Wrangler I’ve ever been in. Now I will say, Jeep does a much better job with dashboard design. The Wrangler and Gladiator’s cockpits are cooler than the Bronco’s. A 4Runner offers better fuel economy, a nicer ride, and has a tiny advantage in practicality. But driving a new Toyota also feels like hiding inside a plastic play fort.
Not Just a Manual Transmission—a Good Manual Transmission
I will admit—I am one of those manual über-alles car dorks. I will always pick a stick if the option exists. But I also concede that not all manual trucks are actually enjoyable. I drove a manual-shift Land Rover Discovery 1 in college, and while I loved how surprised people were by that thing’s very existence, it was pretty sloppy and unsatisfying to operate. Sadly, I can say the same about most manual Jeeps I’ve driven. I want to like them, but they’re not good.
The Bronco’s seven-speed is sweet on two distinctly important levels. For daily street driving, it’s reasonably snappy and responsive. You won’t be able to imagine you’re in Civic Type R, but the lever feels good to throw and row. Driving with a manual off-road is interesting—it’s not as hard as automatic apologists like to tell me, but it’s definitely not easy. The Bronco’s crawler gear addresses that brilliantly.
The shift knob doesn’t have “1” through “7,” it has “C” and “1” through “6.” Practically speaking, it’s a six-speed manual. When you want to creep super slowly, like in a loose climb or rock-crawl scenario, you put it in C and get remarkably precise throttle control. When you put the transfer case into low and then drive in C, you have extreme sensitivity to throttle input, allowing you to consistently move the vehicle at a snail’s pace. This is very useful in super-hairy technical driving or extracting yourself from loose terrain. It’s a real thing of beauty in this context, and the fact that it’s decent and forgiving in daily road driving makes this manual transmission one of my favorites among modern machines.
This is not a token manual—it’s actually a joy to use. Andrew P. Collins
The transfer case shifter, to put the machine in four-wheel drive or low range, is surrounded by a ring you spin to select between terrain modes (what Ford calls “G.O.A.T.” modes). They do all the same things you get in the automatic transmission Bronco (tweak traction control and throttle response), except, of course, alter shift points. You’re still on your own for that one.
To be totally honest, I found it easier to just leave the truck in the same mode and adjust my driving for conditions as they change. But I think if I spent even more time with this system, I might be able to optimize my driving even more by learning the nuances between settings.
Weak Spots
A two-door base-model Bronco Sasquatch is pretty much perfect for what it is and how it’s priced, but I’ll list off my complaints. The backseat is really hard to climb into and uncomfortable; think of it like the back of a 2+2 sports car, just right for kids or dogs. I hate that the parking brake is a tiny electronic switch in the driver’s left knee area. It really feels annoying to use in conjunction with a manual shifter. A lot of the plastic bits and pieces look cheap, but look around the dash of a Bronco from the ’70s or ’80s—it’s bargain basement switchgear there, too. This ain’t a luxury car.
I also hate how low-effort Ford’s Bronco trim decals are. The “Sasquatch” emblem on the fender looks like a die-cut promotional decal from Sticker Mule. It’s too flat and overly detailed—and the same can be said for any trim decal on every Bronco and Bronco Sport. They look awful. Apologies to anyone who worked on them, but they should either be much aesthetically simpler or have more physical depth.
Andrew P. Collins
I mean, I also wish the vehicle had fewer (zero) screens and less plastic, but that’s not how cars work in 2026. It would be really cool if it had a naturally aspirated V8, but I was pretty satisfied with the power and fuel economy in the turbo four, even if it didn’t blow my hair back.
It’d be nice if you could pick options a little more piecemeal. I’d love to spec a base manual with just a rear locker and 31-inch tires instead of the 35s and lift, but I can still take that path thanks to the aftermarket.
Verdict
The sixth-gen Bronco is an awesome platform, and a manual transmission with the Sasquatch package is pretty much the ultimate old-school adventure truck setup with the ideal level of modern refinement. For most people, just pairing the two-door body with the excellent stick shift option is all they need to have a really capable and rewarding off-road driving experience.
I would encourage most people dreaming about “restomodding an old truck” to just get one of these. Leave old trucks alone if you want modern power and interfaces.
If you’re on the fence about the manual, get it. If you’re on the fence about Sasquatch, you can skip it. But if you have the coin to go bigger, the locking diffs and numerically high rear axle ratio make this machine almost unstoppable off-road. If you’re trying to decide between two and four doors, it just comes down to your passenger’s needs. You will want the longer Bronco if you frequently have more than one passenger, but the “coupe” looks way cooler.
Andrew P. Collins
I would pick a Bronco over a 2026 Jeep or Toyota as my overlander of choice, and it’s not even close. Personally, since I’m screen-averse (mostly because I don’t need a daily driver), I’m going to stick with my funky fleet of old trucks. But if I had to count on one vehicle to get me to an office, school, run errands, and also go wheeling in, a Bronco would be the top contender.
Ford provided The Drive with a four-day loan of this vehicle for the purpose of writing this review.
2025 Ford Bronco 7MT Base 2-Door Sasquatch Specs
Price with Sasquatch Package
$50,145 (add $395 for “Marsh Gray” paint as shown)
Powertrain
2.3 I4 Turbo | 7-Speed Manual | 4WD
Horsepower
300
Torque
325
Ground Clearance
11.6″
Approach, Departure, Breakover Angles
43.3° | 37.0° | 28.9°
Max Water Fording Depth
33.5″
Cargo Capacity
52.0 cu. ft. behind first row | 20.6 cu. ft. behind second row
Max Towing
3,500 lbs. (Class II Trailer Tow Package)
Curb Weight
4,332 lbs.
EPA Fuel Economy
19 mpg combined | 18 mpg city | 21 mpg highway
Score
9.5/10
Quick Take
Old-school off-road energy with modern execution—your prayers have been answered.
Bronco Sasquatch California Adventure Bonus Gallery
I ended up with too many pictures for a review—but they’re too nice to let languish on a hard drive until the end of time. So, enjoy, or just scroll on down to the comment section.
Ford Bronco Accessory Mounting: Closer Look
The Bronco has a lot of accessory-mounting provisions. Like, a lot. They’d be great for mounting cameras, pouches, whatever.
Ford Bronco Roof: Closer Look
Removing the front pieces of the Bronco’s roof was easy. Build quality on the rear section seemed OK, but not amazing. The plastic where the roof meets the metal body could have been straighter. Also, the roof panels take up a lot of cargo space, so you might want to swap them for the optional soft ones if you want to be able to do some spontaneous open-air riding with any passengers aboard.
Ford Bronco Doors: Closer Look
I was not able to take the truck’s doors off (just had nowhere to stash them), but here’s a closer look at the door area to give you a sense of how hard it might be to unbolt and remove them.
The automaker’s customers managed to swap more than 1 million batteries in just a week.
Its highest day of swaps during this last sprint was 170,585 batteries—and that wasn’t even its all-time record.
EVs might be getting uber-fast at charging, but there’s still one refueling method in China that makes plugging in feel as archaic as feeding your horse some oats. We’re talking about Nio’s battery swapping tech. Pull in, wait about three minutes, and leave with a fully-charged pack. It’s kind of like going to a car wash, but it gives your car a fresh battery instead of making it squeaky clean.
How popular is it getting, you ask? Well, Nio’s recent statistics point out that during China’s recent May Day travel rush, it completed over 1 million battery swaps in a single week.
Photo by: Nio
Nio was able to perform 1,031,469 separate battery-swapping sessions between April 30 and May 6—or about 147,350 swaps per day. That’s an average of 270 swaps across its 3,839 battery swapping stations, or right around 40 per-site, per-day.
The actual highest day of use was May 1 where Nio swapped out 170,585 batteries. This was a huge number of swaps, but still didn’t quite beat the automaker’s record of 177,627 in a single day (which Nio says was set on February 22nd during the height of China’s Spring Festival travel rush).
Even more impressive was the amount of power delivered via the stations. From May 1 until May 5, Nio says that it provided 15.4 gigawatt-hours of energy, which it claims was around 16.3% of all energy delivered to EVs in China over the same period of time.
Battery swapping has several notable advantages over charging. One is speed. While even the quickest charging stop in the U.S. takes around 20 minutes, and most EVs require more like 30-40, an automated battery-pack swap can take just a few minutes. The batteries are charged slowly on site, reducing the location’s power needs. And the framework enables different battery packs for different use cases. For example, when they embark on a road trip, Nio owners can pay extra for a bigger pack with more range.
As cool as it is, battery swapping does come with some unique challenges. Automakers have to invest in a bunch of spare batteries to store at the site. And interoperability is an issue; Nio’s stations only work with its Nio and Onvo brands. For this to take off industry-wide and become the new default form of EV charging, you’d need to have battery packs that were swappable between manufacturers. (Nio is working with Chinese battery giant CATL on battery-swapping standards.)
In the U.S., the tech has been in its infancy for years. A California-based startup, Ample, had been piloting battery-swapping for ride-hailing drivers and had inked some preliminary deals with automakers, but it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy late last year.
Nio, meanwhile, is pushing ahead. And its swapping stations have proved popular. In fact, Nio has performed more than 100 million battery swaps since 2018.The automaker’s fifth-generation battery swapping facilities will soon begin deployment across China, allowing the stations to support larger wheelbases and help to future proof the tech.
Volkswagen has released teaser images of the most powerful production Polo of all time. Called the Volkswagen ID. Polo GTI, the electric hot hatch, will be officially revealed during the 24h Nurburgring race between May 14 and 17.
The Volkswagen ID. Polo GTI is similar to the current ID. Polo, however, there are a few noticeable differences that can be spotted in the teaser images. For example, the front closed-off grille seems to have a different pattern, the bumpers and side skirts have been reworked to suit the GTI character, and there is a redesigned roof-mounted rear spoiler.
The wheels are bigger and exclusive to this model. The headlights are also different, carrying some red elements. And of course, there is the backlit VW logo in the middle of the tailgate, which is quite familiar as we have seen it in multiple other new-age VW cars.
More details about the Volkswagen ID. Polo GTI will be announced next week. For now, the German auto giant has said in a press release that this is going to be the “most powerful production Polo of all time” and “will offer customers a new and powerful GTI experience” with “maximum power and torque”.